Worked examples · Indices, Surds and Logarithms
Indices, Surds and Logarithms, Worked Examples (KBAT)
Three fully worked hard Indices, Surds and Logarithms problems: solving a logarithmic equation and rejecting the invalid root, turning an index equation into a hidden quadratic, and using a surd conjugate inside an algebraic identity. Attempt each first, then check every line, including the reasoning about which answers to keep, against ours.
How to use this set
This set gathers three hard Indices, Surds and Logarithms problems, each solved line by line so you can see exactly where every step comes from. Each one combines two ideas: a logarithmic equation that ends by rejecting an invalid root, an index equation that hides a quadratic, and a surd question that feeds a rationalised value into an algebraic identity.
Work each question on paper before you look at our solution. Cover the working, attempt it in full, then compare line by line.
At this level the algebra is only half the task, the other half is judgement: checking the domain of a logarithm, spotting that a substitution turns an equation into a quadratic, and choosing an identity that avoids messy expansion. These are exactly the decisions the harder Add Math questions reward.
Watch, in particular, for answers that must be discarded. A logarithm is only defined for a positive argument, so a value that makes any bracket zero or negative cannot be a solution, however cleanly it comes out of the algebra.
Getting into the habit of testing each candidate against the original equation is what separates a full-mark answer from one that loses the final mark.
Three worked examples
Solve .
Show worked solution
Two logarithms with the same base are added, so combine them first with the product law . This turns the left side into a single logarithm:
Now undo the logarithm using the definition . The base is and the right side is , so the argument equals .
The bracket is a difference of two squares, :
The algebra offers two values, but a logarithm is only defined for a positive argument. The original equation contains , which needs , that is .
The value fails this (it would give , which does not exist), so we reject it.
Only survives. Check it in the original equation: , which matches.
So the solution is .
Solve .
Show worked solution
The equation looks awkward until you notice . Writing it that way shows a quadratic hiding inside.
Let ; then , and the equation becomes an ordinary quadratic in :
Factorise: we need two numbers multiplying to and adding to , namely and . So the quadratic factorises and gives two values of :
Now return to by reversing the substitution . Both values are positive, so both are valid (a power is always positive).
Write each as a power of : and .
So or . Check both: for , ; for , .
Both satisfy the equation.
Given that , find the value of , giving your answer as an integer.
Show worked solution
Squaring and directly would be messy, so use the identity . Rearranged, this gives .
So we only need first.
Find by rationalising, multiplying top and bottom by the conjugate . The denominator becomes :
Add and ; the terms cancel neatly, which is why this identity is the efficient route:
Now substitute into the rearranged identity, squaring as :
So . A numerical check: gives , and ; their sum is , confirming the exact answer.
Given that and , express in terms of and .
Show worked solution
Break into factors that connect to the given logarithms: . Since , working in base turns into a sum you can build entirely from and .
The question asks for base , not base , so change base using , and .
Answer
. Sense check: and give , matching from a calculator.
Solve , giving your answer correct to three significant figures.
Show worked solution
The bases and don't match and neither is a power of the other, so take of both sides and bring the powers down using .
Expand both sides and collect the terms on one side. Notice , and , which keeps the working clean.
Answer
(3 s.f.). Sense check: at , both and come out to about , confirming the two sides are equal.
Solve , rejecting any value of that does not satisfy the original equation.
Show worked solution
Square both sides to remove the surd. Squaring can introduce extra solutions that don't actually satisfy the original equation, so every root found this way must be checked afterwards.
Rearrange into a quadratic equal to zero, then factorise.
Test both values in the original equation. At : the left side is but the right side is ; a square root can never equal a negative number, so is rejected.
At : the left side is and the right side is , which match.
Answer
. The value satisfies the squared equation but not the original one, so it must be discarded, squaring is not a reversible step.
Solve the simultaneous equations and , where and are positive.
Show worked solution
Use the quotient law to combine the logarithms into one, then undo the log using its definition to get a simple relationship between and .
Substitute this into the linear equation to solve for , then back-substitute for .
Answer
, . Check: and , so both equations hold, and both values are positive as required.
The number of bacteria in a culture doubles every hours. If the culture starts with bacteria, find, correct to the nearest hour, the time needed for the population to reach .
Show worked solution
Since the population doubles every hours, model it as , where is the time in hours. Set and simplify.
Take of both sides to bring the exponent down, then solve for .
Answer
hours. Sense check: after hours ( doublings) the population is ; after hours ( doublings) it is ; falls between these, close to hours, exactly as found.
Key method points
- Combine same-base logs with the product law before undoing the log, turn a sum of logs into one logarithm, then use .
- Always check a logarithm's domain: the argument must be positive, so reject any root that makes a bracket zero or negative.
- Spot the hidden quadratic: if appears with , substitute (so ), solve for , then convert back to .
- For surds like , rationalise first, then use to avoid heavy expansion.
- Show every line, with analytic marking, correct method earns marks even when a final answer slips.
Don't lose the last mark
The hardest questions here punish two habits. First, forgetting the domain: gives , but needs , so is rejected, state the rejection explicitly.
Second, forgetting that a substitution must be reversed: after solving you still have to convert back to . Finishing each solution with a substitution check catches both, and it is the step that turns a nearly-right answer into a full-mark one.
How a teacher helps
In class our teachers concentrate on the judgement these questions demand, not just the algebra. We train you to state a logarithm's domain before solving, so rejecting an invalid root feels automatic rather than an afterthought.
We help you recognise the shape of a hidden quadratic, and to reverse a substitution fully instead of stopping at . For surds we point to the identity that keeps the working short.
We ask you to talk each decision out loud, combine, undo, substitute, check, so the reasoning becomes secure. Because Add Math is marked analytically, we make sure every line is clear so the method earns marks.
Lessons are in English, built one careful step at a time.
Get 1-to-1 help.
Book a Trial ClassFrequently asked questions
Why did we reject in the logarithm question?
A logarithm is only defined for a positive argument. The equation contains , which needs ; at that would be , which does not exist, so cannot be a solution.
How do I recognise a hidden quadratic in an index equation?
Look for one power that is the square of another. In , note ; substituting turns it into , an ordinary quadratic.
Why use the identity instead of squaring directly?
Because simplifies to , and then needs only one clean squaring. Expanding and its reciprocal separately is far more error-prone.
Do I lose all the marks if my final answer is wrong?
No. Add Math is marked analytically, so clearly shown correct steps still earn method marks even if a later slip spoils the final value.
Source:SRC-DSKP-EN