Worked examples · Indices, Surds and Logarithms
Indices, Surds and Logarithms, Worked Examples (easy)
Four fully worked easy Indices, Surds and Logarithms problems: simplifying with the laws of indices, solving a basic index equation by matching bases, combining like surds, and evaluating logarithms straight from the definition. Attempt each one first, then check every line against ours.
How to use this set
This set gathers four easy Indices, Surds and Logarithms problems, each solved line by line so you can see exactly where every number comes from. Together they cover the four starting skills of this chapter in Add Math: simplifying an expression with the laws of indices, solving a straightforward index equation by matching bases, combining like surds, and reading a logarithm straight from its definition.
Work each question on paper before you look at our solution. Cover the working, attempt it in full, then compare line by line.
Checking this way catches the small slips, a lost negative index, a surd left unsimplified, a base read wrongly, that quietly cost method marks, and it builds the habit of setting out every step clearly.
Notice how indices, surds and logarithms are three views of one idea: a power. An index tells you how many times to multiply a base; a surd is a root, which is just a fractional index; and a logarithm answers the reverse question, 'what power of the base gives this number?'.
Keeping that link in mind turns three topics into one connected skill, and these examples are chosen to make the connection visible.
Four worked examples
Simplify , giving your answer with positive indices only.
Show worked solution
Treat the number and each letter separately, and use the division law : when you divide powers of the same base, you subtract the indices. First divide the numbers: .
Now the terms: . Then the terms: .
Putting these together gives:
The question asks for positive indices only, so rewrite as , using . A negative index simply means the term belongs in the denominator:
So the simplified form is . A quick check with : the original is and our answer is , which agree, so the coefficient is right.
Solve the index equation .
Show worked solution
When both sides can be written as powers of the same base, the plan is to make the bases match and then equate the indices. The left side is already a power of , so write the right side as a power of as well.
Since , we have .
The bases are now equal, so the indices must be equal. This is the key idea: if then .
Setting the indices equal gives a simple linear equation:
So . Check by substituting back: , which matches the right-hand side, so the solution is correct.
Simplify , giving your answer as a single surd term.
Show worked solution
You can only add surds once they share the same number under the root, so first simplify each one. The method is to pull out the largest perfect-square factor using .
For , the largest perfect square dividing is , so . For , the largest perfect square dividing is , so .
Both terms now carry the same surd , so treat like a common factor and add the numbers in front: .
So . As a rough numerical check, and , giving about ; and , so the answer is consistent.
Evaluate without a calculator.
Show worked solution
A logarithm asks 'what power of the base gives this number?'. Read each term with the definition , and work the two logs out separately.
For : we need the power of that gives . Since , we have .
For : we need the power of that gives . Since , we have .
So the value is . Each step just turns the logarithm back into the index statement it stands for, which is the safest way to evaluate simple logs by hand.
Evaluate , giving your answer as a single fraction.
Show worked solution
Use the zero index law and the negative index law separately, then combine the results. The zero index law states that any non-zero base raised to the power equals : .
The negative index law states , so a negative index sends the term to the denominator: .
Answer
So . Since and is a small positive fraction, the sum should be a little more than , and fits that check.
Rationalise the denominator of , giving your answer in the form .
Show worked solution
A surd should not be left in the denominator. Rationalise by multiplying both the numerator and the denominator by , which does not change the value of the fraction since .
The denominator is now the whole number , since . Divide the numerator by to finish simplifying.
Answer
So . As a check, , and , which agree.
Evaluate without using a calculator.
Show worked solution
A fractional index means take the -th root of , then raise the result to the power : . Here and , so first find the cube root of .
Now raise that cube root to the power .
Answer
So . Check the reverse way round: squaring first gives , and the cube root of is also , so the order of root and power does not matter here.
Without using a calculator, evaluate .
Show worked solution
Neither nor is a whole number on its own, so evaluating them separately will not work here. Instead use the quotient law of logarithms, , to combine them into a single logarithm first.
Now evaluate directly from the definition: it asks what power of gives . Since , the value is .
Answer
So . The quotient law is exactly what makes this quick: combine first, then evaluate a single clean logarithm.
Key method points
- Laws of indices: multiply powers of the same base by adding indices, divide by subtracting, and rewrite a negative index as .
- Index equations: write both sides as powers of the same base, then equate the indices, if then .
- Surds: pull out the largest perfect-square factor with ; you can only add or subtract surds that share the same number under the root.
- Logarithms: read as 'the power of that gives ', using .
- Show every line, with analytic marking, correct method earns marks even when a final answer slips.
Common slips to avoid
A negative index does not make the number negative, means , not . When simplifying surds, always factor out the largest perfect square, or you will be left with a surd that still simplifies.
Only 'like' surds combine: , but cannot be added into one term. And read the base of a logarithm carefully, , while .
How a teacher helps
In class our teachers watch the exact spots where marks leak: a negative index dropped, a surd left half-simplified, or the base of a logarithm misread. We ask you to say each law out loud as you use it, add for multiply, subtract for divide, so the reasoning becomes automatic well before the exam.
We also keep pointing out how the three topics connect, so a root becomes a fractional index and a logarithm becomes a rearranged power. Because Add Math is marked analytically, we train you to set out every line clearly, so the method itself earns marks.
Lessons are in English, and we build from these easy cases up one secure step at a time.
Get 1-to-1 help.
Book a Trial ClassFrequently asked questions
What does a negative index actually mean?
A negative index sends the term to the other side of the fraction: . So , the value stays positive, and the index only tells you it belongs in the denominator.
When can I add two surds together?
Only when they have the same number under the root after simplifying. because both are multiples of , but stays as it is, the roots are different.
How do I evaluate a logarithm without a calculator?
Turn it back into an index statement. asks 'what power of gives ?'; since , the answer is .
Using makes simple logs quick and safe.
Do I lose all the marks if my final answer is wrong?
No. Add Math is marked analytically, so clearly shown correct steps still earn method marks even if a later slip spoils the final value.
Source:SRC-DSKP-EN