Method · Quadratic Functions
How to Complete the Square
To complete the square, rewrite in the form . The point is the vertex, so you can read the minimum or maximum value straight from .
What completing the square is for
Completing the square is a way of rewriting a quadratic expression in the tidy form , often called vertex form. The two forms describe exactly the same curve, but the second one hands you information the first one hides.
From we can read the turning point of the parabola at once: its coordinates are . If the curve opens upward and is the minimum value; if it opens downward and is the maximum value.
In Add Math this single skill unlocks minimum and maximum problems, the axis of symmetry, sketching parabolas, and even solving quadratic equations when factorising is awkward.
We reach for vertex form because it turns a hard question into a reading exercise. Once a quadratic sits as , the smallest value the squared bracket can take is zero, so the whole expression is never smaller than when , the minimum is handed to you without calculus and without a graph.
This is a core Form 4 skill in the Quadratic Functions chapter, and it feeds directly into the range of a function, the axis of symmetry , and the direction the curve opens. Getting it solid early makes later topics much easier to follow.
When to use this method
Reach for completing the square whenever a question asks for the minimum value, the maximum value, or the turning point of a quadratic function. The wording often says "express in the form " and then "state the minimum point".
It is also the right tool when a quadratic will not factorise neatly and you still need its roots, or when you are asked for the range of a quadratic function. If you see a parabola sketch with its vertex marked, or a phrase like "least value", that is your cue.
Because the vertex form makes the symmetry obvious, quadratic-function questions built on this method appear in both Paper 1 and Paper 2.
Watch also for optimisation-style word problems, greatest area, least cost, maximum height, that hide a quadratic inside a real-world story. Rewriting the expression in vertex form gives the best value directly, and the value of that achieves it, without any guessing.
The steps
Here is the full procedure. When a leading coefficient is present, work in this order:
- 1
Make the coefficient of equal to 1
If , factor out of the and terms only, and leave the constant outside the bracket.
- 2
Halve the coefficient of
Take the number in front of inside the bracket, halve it, and call the result . This is what goes inside .
- 3
Add and subtract the square
Add and subtract inside the bracket so the value is unchanged, then group the first three terms as a perfect square .
- 4
Multiply the bracket back out
Expand the factor across the term you created, and combine it with the constant left outside.
- 5
Write the vertex form and read the answer
State the result as ; the turning point is , and is the minimum (if ) or the maximum (if ).
Keep the value unchanged
Every time you add inside the bracket you must subtract the same , so you are really adding zero. That is what lets you rewrite the expression without ever changing it.
Worked example
Try this yourself first, then check each line against the solution.
Express in the form . Hence state the minimum point of the graph of .
Show worked solution
Start by factoring 2 out of the terms that contain , keeping the constant outside the bracket:
The coefficient of inside the bracket is 4. Halve it to get 2, so and .
Add and subtract 4 inside the bracket:
Group the first three terms as a perfect square:
Multiply the 2 across the bracket and simplify the constants:
So , and . Because , the parabola opens upward, so is the minimum value, reached when , that is .
Answer
The minimum point is . We can check by expanding: , which is the original expression.
Because the vertex form is now visible, two more answers come for free. The axis of symmetry is the vertical line through the vertex, .
And since the least value of is , the range of is . Reading three results from one line of algebra is exactly why examiners like this form.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Forgetting to factor out first. When the coefficient of is not 1, you must take it out of the and terms before halving.
- Halving but not squaring, or squaring but not subtracting. You must add and subtract the same so the expression keeps its value.
- Forgetting to multiply the by the factor when it leaves the bracket. This is the most common sign error.
- Reading the vertex as instead of . The -coordinate is the value that makes the bracket zero.
- Assuming is always a minimum. It is only the minimum when ; when the curve opens downward and is the maximum.
How a teacher helps you get it right
Almost every lost mark in completing the square comes from one specific line, most often the moment the factor has to be multiplied back across the term. In a one-to-one lesson our teacher watches you work that exact line, spots whether the slip is a sign, a missing factor, or a halving error, and has you redo just that step until it is automatic.
Because our teachers are experienced, you get someone who explains the why, not only the how. Lessons are online and taught in English, and because working is marked step by step, we show you how to earn method marks even when the final number goes wrong.
We also build the habit of a ten-second check, expanding the vertex form back to the original, so a careless slip never survives to the final line.
Get 1-to-1 help.
Book a Trial ClassFrequently asked questions
When should I complete the square instead of using the quadratic formula?
Use completing the square when a question asks for the minimum or maximum value, the turning point, or the range of a quadratic, the vertex form gives these directly. The quadratic formula only gives the roots.
How do I find the turning point once the expression is in vertex form?
From , the turning point is . The -coordinate is the value that makes the bracket zero, and is the -value there.
What if the coefficient of is not 1?
Factor it out of the and terms first, complete the square inside the bracket, then multiply that factor back across when you take the out. Forgetting this step is the most common mistake.
Does completing the square work for solving quadratic equations too?
Yes. Once you have , rearrange to and take the square root of both sides.
It is especially handy when the quadratic does not factorise neatly.
How is completing the square different from factorising?
Factorising writes a quadratic as a product such as , which is best for finding roots. Completing the square writes it as , which is best for the turning point, the range, and the least or greatest value.
They answer different questions, so it is worth being fluent in both.
Source:SRC-DSKP-EN