Worked examples · Linear Law
Linear Law, Worked Examples (medium)
These medium Linear Law examples take the reductions a step further, dividing through to linearise , and taking logarithms to straighten the power law and the exponential law . Each one ends by reading the constants from the straight line.
Try every question on paper first, then check each line against our working.
What these examples cover
These medium Linear Law examples move past reading a ready-made straight line and into the reductions themselves. You will divide a relation through by to linearise , then use logarithms to straighten two of the most common exam relations: the power law and the exponential law .
Each one uses small, clean numbers so the algebra stays visible. The best way to use the set is to cover the solution, attempt the reduction and the arithmetic in full on paper, and only then check line by line against our working.
If your answer differs, find the exact step where the two solutions part company, deciding what to plot and where the logarithm lands is where most marks are won or lost.
Worked examples
Work through all three. Attempt each fully before you read the matching solution, and watch how the same discipline, rearrange into , name and , then match gradient and intercept to the constants, carries every one.
The variables and are related by , where and are constants. A straight-line graph of against passes through the points and .
Find the values of and .
Show worked solution
First linearise the relation. Divide every term by so the equation matches :
So the vertical axis is and the horizontal axis is . The gradient is and the intercept is .
Find the gradient from the two points:
Substitute the point to find the intercept :
Answer
and , so . Check with the second point: at , , and , which matches .
The variables and are related by , where and are constants. When is plotted against , a straight line passes through and .
Find the values of and .
Show worked solution
Take of both sides and use the power and product laws of logarithms to straighten the relation:
Comparing with , the vertical axis is and the horizontal axis is . The gradient is and the intercept is .
Find the gradient from the two points:
Substitute the point to find the intercept , then undo the logarithm:
Answer
and , so . Check the second point: at , , which matches .
The variables and are related by , where and are constants. When is plotted against , a straight line passes through and .
Find the values of and .
Show worked solution
Take of both sides. Here the variable sits in the exponent, so the power law brings it down as a coefficient:
Comparing with , the vertical axis is and the horizontal axis is . The gradient is and the intercept is .
The point sits on the vertical axis, so it gives the intercept directly:
Now find the gradient from the two points and undo the logarithm to get :
Answer
and , so . Check the second point: at , , which matches .
The variables and are related by , where and are constants. A straight-line graph of against passes through the points and .
Find the values of and .
Show worked solution
This relation is already linear once the horizontal axis is : the vertical axis is and the horizontal axis is , matching . The gradient is and the intercept is .
Find the gradient from the two points:
Substitute the point to find :
Answer
and , so . Check the second point: at , , which matches .
The variables and are related by , where and are constants. A straight-line graph of against passes through the points and .
Find the values of and .
Show worked solution
Divide every term by so the equation matches :
So the vertical axis is and the horizontal axis is . The gradient is and the intercept is .
Find the gradient from the two points:
Substitute the point to find the intercept :
Answer
and , so , i.e. . Check the second point: at , , which matches .
The variables and are related by , where and are constants. A straight-line graph of against passes through the points and .
Find the values of and .
Show worked solution
This relation is already linear once the vertical axis is : and , matching . The gradient is and the intercept is .
Find the gradient from the two points:
Substitute the point to find :
Answer
and , so , i.e. . Check the second point: at , , which matches .
The variables and are related by , where and are constants. When is plotted against , a straight line passes through and .
Find the values of and .
Show worked solution
Take of both sides. Because is squared inside the power, itself becomes the horizontal variable:
Comparing with , the vertical axis is and the horizontal axis is . The gradient is and the intercept is .
The point sits on the vertical axis, so it gives the intercept directly:
Now find the gradient from the two points and undo the logarithm to get :
Answer
and , so . Check the second point: at , , which matches .
The variables and are related by , where and are constants. A straight-line graph of against passes through the points and .
Find the values of and .
Show worked solution
This relation is already linear once the vertical axis is : and , matching . The gradient is and the intercept is .
Find the gradient from the two points:
Substitute the point to find :
Answer
and , so . Check the second point: at , , which matches .
The three questions look different, one divides through, two take logarithms, yet the plan is identical: rearrange until the equation reads as , state exactly what and are, and only then match the gradient and intercept to the constants. Naming the axes before you touch the numbers is what keeps a power law and an exponential law from being confused.
Key method points
These three examples rehearse the reductions that carry the harder half of Linear Law. Keep the following points in mind as you practise more.
- To linearise , divide every term by : , so plot against .
- For a power law , take of both sides: , so plot against .
- For an exponential law , take of both sides: , so plot against .
- The difference is where sits: makes the gradient and needs on the horizontal axis; makes the gradient and keeps itself.
- When the intercept equals or , undo it with a power of ten: .
- Because marking is analytic, a correct reduction earns method marks even before you reach the final values of the constants.
How a teacher helps
The slip we see most often here is a rushed logarithm, leaving the intercept as instead of , or confusing a power law with an exponential one. In a one-to-one lesson our teacher slows the reduction down with you, so you can see exactly why belongs on one graph and plain on the other.
Because our teachers are experienced, you work with someone who explains the why behind each step, not just the what. Lessons are taught in English, while SPM papers are set in both Malay and English, so the notation reads the same to you either way.
Get 1-to-1 help.
Book a Trial ClassFrequently asked questions
How do I decide between plotting and plotting ?
Look at where the variable sits. In a power law the is the base, so you plot against .
In an exponential law the is the exponent, so you plot against plain .
Why divide by for ?
Dividing every term by gives , which is a straight line in and . The gradient becomes and the intercept becomes , so both constants can be read from one line.
The intercept came out as . How do I get ?
Undo the logarithm by raising ten to that power: . Leaving your answer as is a common way to lose the final mark, so always convert back to or .
How can I check my constants at the end?
Substitute the second given point into your straight-line equation. If it produces the correct value on the graph, and the original relation reproduces the data, both constants are secure.
Source:SRC-DSKP-EN