Chapter · Trigonometric Functions
The trig identities worth knowing cold
Nine trigonometric identities sit on the formula sheet issued with the exam papers, the Pythagorean identity, the three addition formulae, and the three double-angle formulae. You do not memorise these; you look them up.
What actually earns marks is knowing which one to reach for, how to start a proof from either side, and how to read backwards when a question needs it rearranged.
Which identities are given, and which are not
Every SPM Add Math paper is issued with a formula list, and nine trigonometric identities sit on it: the Pythagorean identity and its two variants, the three addition formulae, and the three double-angle formulae. That single fact changes how you should spend your revision time.
There is no mark for reciting from memory when it is printed in front of you, the marks sit entirely in choosing the right identity for the question and applying it correctly under pressure.
| Identity | What it says |
|---|---|
| Pythagorean identity | |
| Secant identity | |
| Cosecant identity | |
| Sine addition | |
| Cosine addition | |
| Tangent addition | |
| Double angle (sin) | |
| Double angle (cos) | |
| Double angle (tan) |
Spend memory on using them, not reciting them
All nine identities above are given. Your revision time is better spent on twenty minutes of proving identities with them than on flashcards trying to memorise the formulae themselves.
How to prove an identity, step by step
"Prove that" questions unsettle students who are used to solving for a value, because there is no single number to chase, the goal is to show two expressions are equal for every valid angle. The method is more disciplined than it looks once you have a fixed starting point.
- 1
Pick the messier side
Start working from whichever side of the identity has more terms, a fraction, or a mix of trig ratios. It is almost always easier to simplify a complicated expression down than to build a simple one up.
- 2
Convert everything to sin and cos if stuck
, and can each be rewritten in terms of and . When a proof stalls, rewriting every ratio this way and simplifying the resulting fraction usually unsticks it.
- 3
Reach for the Pythagorean identity to swap terms
lets you replace with , or the reverse, whenever a substitution would simplify the working, this single move unlocks a large share of proof questions.
- 4
Finish by matching the other side exactly
The proof is only complete once your working reaches the exact form of the other side, not just something equivalent to it. State that clearly as the final line.
Prove that .
Show worked solution
Start from the left-hand side. Using , the numerator becomes .
So , provided . Subtracting 1 gives , which matches the right-hand side exactly.
The double-angle formulas, used both ways
is given in three equivalent forms, and knowing which one to reach for is a skill in its own right.
- Use when the question already has both squared ratios present.
- Use when you want to end up with cosine only, common in equations solved for .
- Use when the question is phrased in terms of sine, or when it needs rearranging into .
That last rearrangement is the "backwards" use worth practising deliberately: reading as a way to express in terms of , rather than the other direction. It resurfaces later whenever a squared trig term needs to be broken down into a single angle instead of a doubled one, including in some integration questions in Form 5.
Same idea for sin 2A and tan 2A
is only ever used one way, to combine or split a product of sine and cosine. is most useful when a question is already phrased entirely in tangents and a sine/cosine detour would cost time.
Where marks are lost on identity questions
The identities themselves are given, so lost marks on this topic rarely come from a wrong formula. They come from a small set of habits worth checking for on purpose.
Do not treat an unproven identity as an equation
Cross-multiplying or squaring both sides of a "prove that" statement before it is proven true is invalid logic, you would be assuming the very thing you are meant to demonstrate. Work one side at a time toward the other instead.
- Losing a sign when expanding , the sign flips relative to , and it is easy to copy the wrong one under time pressure.
- Substituting correctly but then forgetting to simplify the resulting difference of two squares.
- Stopping one line early, reaching an expression that is equivalent to, but not written identically as, the target side.
Why analytic marking rewards a clear line of working
Both Paper 1 (2 hours, 80 marks) and Paper 2 (2 hours 30 minutes, 100 marks) mark identity proofs analytically, awarding marks for each correct step. Writing the substitution and the simplification as separate lines, rather than combining them in your head, protects marks even if the final line is not reached in time.
Where these identities show up beyond "prove that"
Trigonometric identities are not confined to standalone proof questions. They quietly do the work inside several other question types across both papers.
- Solving trigonometric equations, an equation mixing and usually needs a double-angle substitution before it can be solved with a single ratio.
- Sketching and reading trig graphs, recognising that completes a full cycle twice as fast as comes directly from the identity, not from plotting points.
- Simplifying expressions before differentiating or integrating them in Form 5 calculus, where a product like is often rewritten as first.
Recognising an identity as the hidden first step in a longer question, rather than only when the words "prove that" appear, is often what separates a question that looks unfamiliar from one that is actually routine.
How one-to-one teaching can help
Trig identities reward pattern recognition more than raw memory, and pattern recognition is exactly the kind of thing that develops faster with someone watching your working in real time. A teacher can see, within one or two proofs, whether you default to converting everything to sine and cosine, whether you spot a Pythagorean substitution quickly, and where your specific hesitation is, then build practice around that gap rather than a generic worksheet.
Our teachers are experienced; lessons run online and are taught in English, while SPM papers themselves are set bilingually in Bahasa Melayu and English.
If trigonometric identities, or trigonometric functions more broadly, are a recurring sticking point, a one-hour paid trial class at the teacher's own rate (from RM50 per hour, depending on experience) is a reasonable way to see how that works before committing further. We will not promise a particular grade, but we can help the nine given identities stop feeling like a list to search through and start feeling like tools you reach for on instinct.
Get 1-to-1 help.
Book a Trial ClassFrequently asked questions
Do I need to memorise the trig identities for SPM Add Math?
No, the Pythagorean identity, the three addition formulae, and the three double-angle formulae are all printed on the formula list issued with the exam. What you need to practise is recognising which one applies and using it correctly, since marking is analytic and rewards each correct step.
What's the best way to start proving a trig identity?
Work from the more complicated side first, the one with a fraction, more terms, or a mix of ratios. Converting everything to and is a reliable fallback whenever the proof stalls.
How is the double-angle formula different from the addition formula?
The double-angle formulae (for , , ) are the special case of the addition formulae when . They are given separately because has three equally useful forms, and choosing the right one for a question is a skill worth practising on its own.
Why do some proofs work from both sides toward the middle?
When neither side simplifies cleanly on its own, simplifying both sides independently until they reach the same intermediate expression is a valid and often faster route to the same proof, as long as each side's working is shown clearly.
Source:SRC-FORMAT